@article {830, title = {Total white matter hyperintensity volume in bipolar disorder patients and their healthy relatives.}, journal = {Bipolar Disord}, volume = {14}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Dec}, pages = {888-93}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVES: White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are more common in subjects with bipolar disorder (BP) than in healthy subjects (HS). Few studies have examined the effect of the diagnostic type of bipolar illness on WMH burden, and none have approached this question through a direct measurement of the volume of affected white matter in relationship to familiality. In this pilot study, we utilized a volumetric measurement of WMH to investigate the relationship between the total volume of WMH and the familiality and type of BP.

METHODS: Forty-five individuals with bipolar I disorder (BP-I) with psychotic features, BP-I without psychotic features, or bipolar II disorder (BP-II), seven of their unaffected relatives, and 32 HS were recruited for participation. T-2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained on all subjects, and the total volume of all WMH for each subject was measured in cubic centimeters. The significance of difference between groups was tested using ANOVA with post-hoc adjustment for multiple comparisons. Further, we used logistic regression to test for trends between symptom load and total WMH volume.

RESULTS: The mean total volume of WMH in BP-I patients with psychotic features was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of HS. Further, we observed a positive linear trend by familiality and type of affectedness when comparing mean total WMH volume of HS, unaffected family members, subjects with BP-II, and BP-I with and without a history of psychosis (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Based on a quantitative technique, WMH burden appears to be associated with familiality and type of BP. The significance of these findings remains to be fully elucidated.

}, keywords = {Adult, Analysis of Variance, Bipolar Disorder, Brain, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Leukoencephalopathies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated}, issn = {1399-5618}, doi = {10.1111/bdi.12019}, author = {Tighe, Sarah K and Reading, Sarah A and Rivkin, Paul and Caffo, Brian and Schweizer, Barbara and Pearlson, Godfrey and Potash, James B and Depaulo, J Raymond and Bassett, Susan S} } @article {832, title = {Towards Automatic Quantitative Quality Control for MRI.}, journal = {Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng}, volume = {8314}, year = {2012}, month = {2012 Feb 23}, abstract = {

Quality and consistency of clinical and research data collected from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scanners may become suspect due to a wide variety of common factors including, experimental changes, hardware degradation, hardware replacement, software updates, personnel changes, and observed imaging artifacts. Standard practice limits quality analysis to visual assessment by a researcher/clinician or a quantitative quality control based upon phantoms which may not be timely, cannot account for differing experimental protocol (e.g. gradient timings and strengths), and may not be pertinent to the data or experimental question at hand. This paper presents a parallel processing pipeline developed towards experiment specific automatic quantitative quality control of MRI data using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as an experimental test case. The pipeline consists of automatic identification of DTI scans run on the MRI scanner, calculation of DTI contrasts from the data, implementation of modern statistical methods (wild bootstrap and SIMEX) to assess variance and bias in DTI contrasts, and quality assessment via power calculations and normative values. For this pipeline, a DTI specific power calculation analysis is developed as well as the first incorporation of bias estimates in DTI data to improve statistical analysis.

}, issn = {1018-4732}, doi = {10.1117/12.910819}, author = {Lauzon, Carolyn B and Caffo, Brian C and Landman, Bennett A} } @article {pmid20227508, title = {Two-stage decompositions for the analysis of functional connectivity for fMRI with application to Alzheimer{\textquoteright}s disease risk}, journal = {Neuroimage}, volume = {51}, number = {3}, year = {2010}, month = {Jul}, pages = {1140{\textendash}1149}, author = {Caffo, B and Crainiceanu, C and Verduzco, G. and Joel, S. and Mostofsky, S and Bassett, S and Pekar, J} } @article {he2008toward, title = {Toward Realistic and Practical Ideal Observer (IO) Estimation for the Optimization of Medical Imaging Systems}, journal = {IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, PMCID: PMC2739397}, volume = {27}, number = {10}, year = {2008}, pages = {1535{\textendash}1543}, author = {He, X and Caffo, B and Frey, E} }