@article {808,
	title = {Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".},
	journal = {Neuroimage},
	volume = {81},
	year = {2013},
	month = {2013 Nov 1},
	pages = {499-502},
	abstract = {<p>The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article.</p>},
	keywords = {Neuroimaging, Peer Review, Research, Research Design, Statistics as Topic},
	issn = {1095-9572},
	doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056},
	author = {Lindquist, Martin A and Caffo, Brian and Crainiceanu, Ciprian}
}
