Skip to main content
Home

Search form

  • Home
  • Calendar
  • People
    • Key Personnel
    • Members
    • Collaborators
  • Grants
  • Papers
  • Blogs
  • Wiki
  • Log In
Home / Body composition and arsenic metabolism: a cross-sectional analysis in the Strong Heart Study.

Body composition and arsenic metabolism: a cross-sectional analysis in the Strong Heart Study.

TitleBody composition and arsenic metabolism: a cross-sectional analysis in the Strong Heart Study.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2013
AuthorsGribble MO, Crainiceanu CM, Howard BV, Umans JG, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, Zhang Y, Silbergeld EK, Guallar E, Navas-Acien A
JournalEnviron Health
Volume12
Pagination107
Date Published2013
ISSN1476-069X
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between measures of body composition and patterns of urine arsenic metabolites in the 1989-1991 baseline visit of the Strong Heart Study, a cardiovascular disease cohort of adults recruited from rural communities in Arizona, Oklahoma, North Dakota and South Dakota.

METHODS: We evaluated 3,663 Strong Heart Study participants with urine arsenic species above the limit of detection and no missing data on body mass index, % body fat and fat free mass measured by bioelectrical impedance, waist circumference and other variables. We summarized urine arsenic species patterns as the relative contribution of inorganic (iAs), methylarsonate (MMA) and dimethylarsinate (DMA) species to their sum. We modeled the associations of % arsenic species biomarkers with body mass index, % body fat, fat free mass, and waist circumference categories in unadjusted regression models and in models including all measures of body composition. We also considered adjustment for arsenic exposure and demographics.

RESULTS: Increasing body mass index was associated with higher mean % DMA and lower mean % MMA before and after adjustment for sociodemographic variables, arsenic exposure, and for other measures of body composition. In unadjusted linear regression models, % DMA was 2.4 (2.1, 2.6) % higher per increase in body mass index category (< 25, ≥25 & <30, ≥30 & <35, ≥35 kg/m2), and % MMA was 1.6 (1.4, 1.7) % lower. Similar patterns were observed for % body fat, fat free mass, and waist circumference measures in unadjusted models and in models adjusted for potential confounders, but the associations were largely attenuated or disappeared when adjusted for body mass index.

CONCLUSION: Measures of body size, especially body mass index, are associated with arsenic metabolism biomarkers. The association may be related to adiposity, fat free mass or body size. Future epidemiologic studies of arsenic should consider body mass index as a potential modifier for arsenic-related health effects.

DOI10.1186/1476-069X-12-107
Alternate JournalEnviron Health
PubMed ID24321145
PubMed Central IDPMC3883520
Grant List5T32DK062707-10 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
5T32HL007024 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HL41642 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HL41652 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HL41654 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
HL65521 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
P30ES03819 / ES / NIEHS NIH HHS / United States
R01ES021367 / ES / NIEHS NIH HHS / United States
R01HL090863 / HL / NHLBI NIH HHS / United States
T32 DK062707 / DK / NIDDK NIH HHS / United States
T32 ES013678 / ES / NIEHS NIH HHS / United States
  • Google Scholar
  • BibTeX

Navigation

  • Statistical methods
    • General
    • Causal Inference
    • Population ICA
    • PVD
    • Testing
    • Prediction / Machine Learning
    • Computation
    • Visualization
    • Structural PCA
  • Scientific areas of interest
    • Brain imaging - Variability
    • Brain Imaging - Prediction
    • Brain Imaging - Clinical
    • Wearable Computing
    • Biosignals
  • Software & Tutorials
  • Social media
  • Logos
© 2012 smart-stats.org