Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules".
| Title | Ironing out the statistical wrinkles in "ten ironic rules". |
| Publication Type | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication | 2013 |
| Authors | Lindquist MA, Caffo B, Crainiceanu C |
| Journal | Neuroimage |
| Volume | 81 |
| Pagination | 499-502 |
| Date Published | 2013 Nov 1 |
| ISSN | 1095-9572 |
| Keywords | Neuroimaging, Peer Review, Research, Research Design, Statistics as Topic |
| Abstract | The article "Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers" (Friston, 2012) shares some commonly heard frustrations about the peer-review process that all researchers can identify with. Though we found the article amusing, we have some concerns about its description of a number of statistical issues. In this commentary we address these issues, as well as the premise of the article. |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.056 |
| Alternate Journal | Neuroimage |
| PubMed ID | 23587691 |
| PubMed Central ID | PMC3730443 |
| Grant List | 088130 / / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom P41 EB015909 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States R01 EB012547 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States R01 EB016061 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States R01 NS060910 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States |